Reclaiming Non-Binary (Thinking)

‘Keir Starmer-era New Culture Convictions - free speech, upskirting, staring, pub banter - are those for which his tenure will be remembered, and that’s gotta hurt the man who thought he was destined to complete Tony Blair’s social justice revolution’

Not everything has to be about sexual identity. Non-binary may have been spannered into an idea of how (generally young) people who don’t feel like either sex ‘identify’, or fancy, but in perspective terms it is about rejecting black-and-white thinking in recognition that the world actually operates in a multitude of shades of grey. The adult world, that is.

Digital age media profits on our individuated, emotional responses to primal fears written into headlines, and it has never been more important to see through and past that. Via these headlines, if your political goal is to get rid of an opponent, and it usually is, the best and most difficult to counter is by means of a direct or increasingly adjacent sex scandal.

New Labour master strategist Peter Mandelson has been exposed by the Epstein Files as having passed sensitive financial information to US financier Jeffrey Epstein at the time of the 2008-9 financial crisis, potentially allowing Epstein to profit into the multi-millions. However most press coverage has been about him standing around in his pants on Epstein Island, and calling Epstein his best friend.

The commentary on the X platform has been deeply hypocritical on this subject, as many of not most people will by now know or know of a person convicted of a sexual offence - PCOSO - and being friends with PCOSOs is not only not a crime, it is in fact a very honourable thing to do. This is because much of the time they are not guilty of the alleged offences (up to 15,000 people in prison at any time), and if they are they may have sought help or be way past rehabilitation.

Ditto for Prince Andrew. His ‘guilty of being too honourable’ comment to Emily Maitlis on that Newsnight interview was in fact true, decent and indeed honourable, but it’s easier to condemn along Labour-hating lines. If you do support Labour you’ll just go quiet until it blows over, as per Tony Blair and Alistair Campbell.

Epstein wasn’t in literal fact a ‘paedophile’ as every broadcaster seems to need to add to his name, as a paedophile is literally someone who is exclusively attracted to pre-pubescent children. Epstein was apparently as disgusted by that as most others. He rather seemed to be an ephebophile, someone who has an attraction to post-pubescent young teens. Neither are acceptable in contemporary western society, but they are considered ‘orientations’, and that’s the diagnostic world in which we live.

The UK justice-media industry has made ‘rapists’ of the majority of men, they just don’t know it yet. The 1970s misanthropic feminist slogan ‘all men are rapists/all sex is rape’ has been turned into law across the West, by a decades-long process of scope-creep. ‘That which can be asserted without evidence can be refuted without evidence’ said the late Christopher Hitchens, but the need for actual evidence in rape and sexual assault trials has been essentially removed from western courts (it is seen as ‘further traumatisation’).

Third-Partyism has become a weapon of lawfare, as those around the complainant pressure them/her into making charges under the guise of ‘protecting other women’, when the reality is they are just salivating at another insufficiently risk-averse male being marginalised if not destroyed.

Most moralistic judgements are actually a lack of imagination, and the one-eyed mainstream media coverage of the #MeToo-era bear this out in resplendence. Ellie Wilson, calling for prosecution solicitors to be less forthright in their questioning of complainants, is the new Charlotte Proudman, sacrificing legal objectivity on the altar of sisterhood ‘feels’. They both contain a certain fourth-wave insolence and possibly neurodiverse black-and-white thinking, jollied along by the carrot of compensation and social capital.

The war on white male heteronormativity may have been going on for over a century, and indeed other skin colours are often implicated, but misanthropic feminism sees whiteness as the power to be eradicated to the best of its ability. ‘Men are now seen as human doings rather than human beings’ wrote the sex-equalist William Collins, aka Rick Bradford, acknowledging the work that a misanthropic feminism-captured media has done, reducing the male to a one-dimensional tool, simply useful for a handful of purposes.

Then there is the suicidal empathy of the ‘simps’, or misandrist feminist-compliant males who think they are being kind and fair by acquiescing to every unjust demand placed upon them, sometimes for a quiet life, sometimes because they think they’re ‘being kind’, often for in-group popularity or possibly romantic brownie points.

The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) meanwhile is a zombie quango, hiding its failure to refer difficult cases to the Court of Appeal behind ‘process’. After nearly thirty years of its existence, a ‘People’s CCRC’ seems now utterly essential in the pursuit of redeeming Britain’s reputation for Good Justice, now in the bin thanks to the multi-tiered nature of recent, craven governments.

This multi-tiered bias was exposed in the form of Lucy Connolly, imprisoned for eighteen months following Axel Rudakabana’s Southport murders, for an emotional outburst post on X. Connolly was put in prison for typing ‘let them burn down for all I care’ regarding hotels containing illegal immigrants; but even the judge all but admitted it was a deterrent sentence.

Connolly has helped put Lord Timpson’s probation service under the spotlight, as they are trying to monitor ‘risk’, but of what? The risk of another emotional outburst? It might help if it comes from the spouse of a Conservative councillor.

Keir Starmer-era New Culture Convictions - free speech, upskirting, staring, pub banter - are those for which his tenure will be remembered, and that’s gotta hurt the man who thought he was destined to complete Tony Blair’s social justice revolution. Part of this revolution is in putting ‘trauma-informed’ public servants in authority roles such as judges and police, i.e. people who have claimed to have gone through the allegations of crimes with which they themselves are dealing.

Social justice or bureaucratic vigilanteism? These Activist WPCs are all over the news, spokeswomanning about every grisly crime they can. They try for the cool detachment of Juliet Bravo, but are as see through as a window. The result, of course, is more men in prison or on registers, maintaining innocence - but their families and friends are becoming increasingly vocal, as in the JIMS (Justice for Innocent Men Scotland) campaign.

Another kind of ‘trauma-informed’ is a woman named Elizabeth Yeld, driven to distraction by what she sees as the wrongful conviction of her teacher husband in the 2010s, she daily calls out injustices on both sides of the Atlantic on X. Does Yeld’s trauma not count to the prevailing, misanthropic feminist authorities? Well, no it doesn’t, as the damage done to the loved ones of those claiming to have been wrongfully convicted doesn’t count in an ideologically-fixated justice system like that of the UK in the mid-2020s.

False allegations do lead to long-term harm, whatever the misanthropic feminists may say about Johnny Depp’s career being ‘fine’, as Coven Cancellations, or Sisterhood Safeguarding, will envelop the Person Maintaining Innocence (PMI) for the foreseeable future.

Google remembers even wrongful convictions and false arrests, and most companies won’t want to be associated with anyone who has been through this, particularly at a time where in some places a hundred people-plus are applying for barista jobs. Most open people will have a compulsion to tell potential employers, project colleagues, partners anyway, and sometimes it’ll be ok (usually depending on the politics of the person), but the ‘no smoke without fire’ trope still lingers.

The rock ‘n’ roll age died with Jonathan King’s conviction for child abuse convictions at the turn of the century, convictions for which he maintains innocence. One of a handful of men who designed British pop rock and roll in the 1960s and thereafter, he was tossed onto the scrapheap in the Great Bonfire of the DJs in the early 2000s during the Great Feminisation of culture and the justice system.

Gay or straight, unless you were very cool you were gone. And JK was defiantly not cool. King is in fact an Oscar Wilde or Alan Turing for the twenty-first century, prosecuted under laws that modern fairness should never have existed, and piled on by the medias of their respective ages.

Intersectional demonisation soon followed the Great Feminisation, as Blair’s mass immigration policies led to many fighting age men moving to Britain for a number of reasons, not all fleeing war, and caring not for the new ‘consent’ laws of the land. They saw their holy scriptures and customs, in which a girl out on her own is fair game, as superior to any such politenesses.

In tandem with a leftist British education system determined to do itself and its history down, they spotted a soft underbelly ripe for slashing open, and the result was the grooming gangs scandal, finally amplified by Musk in the mid 2020s. Sex allegations then became a proxy for anti-immigrant feeling, as #MeToo sensitivities clashed with OnlyFans hookup culture, while the country filled up with people who weren’t paying attention to the otherwise ubiquitous consent narrative.

There became clear chinks in the progressive armoury however, as the trans vs women’s rights debate exploded, and tested progressive ideas of ‘being kind’ - did that include giving up sex-based rights to confused, mentally ill or deviant men? While whatever an indigenous culture did in this country was fine, from female genital mutilation to castration to child marriage; unless that indigenous culture was white, which was exposed as being the original sin to progressives.

The Trans Activist lesson for the false allegations movement was in making a tiny, niche, not-for-everybody movement, under the radar for decades, into headline news. However, the Johnny Depp US trial, Andy Malkinson exoneration, Postmasters scandal and Lucy Letby furore did all indicate a reckoning for multi-tiered justice in the UK, with the need for reform at the CPS and CCRC utterly obvious to any sane person observing.

Intent spectrums in crime - and art - were being constantly challenged, as the different between intending to cause harm, as in Wayne Couzens or Axel Rudakabana, were conflated by Starmer’s process-based philosophy of government into the unintentional; as in Lucy Connolly’s Rudakabana reaction social media post, for which she got nearly two years; or Kevin Spacey’s condemnation for being too ‘pushy’ as a closeted homosexual man in his earlier life.

What is increasingly clear is that the media is in fact more powerful than the few laws that parliament is able to push through to placate it. It controls how we feel about an individual or a lifestyle, directed by owners and editors with a vested political interest in pushing their own agendas. There isn’t much profit in that ageless question ‘How would I feel if that were being done to me?’, that eternal auto-morality checker, and our binary reactions have now been fully maximised by the technological revolution.

By Sean Bw Parker